Home Politics

While Marjorie Taylor Greene insists there are ‘two genders’ in America, onlookers argue there is ‘one sociopath’ in Congress

At least someone is making sense.

Marjorie Taylor Greene - Getty
Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

To say that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been on something of an unhinged roll lately would probably be the understatement of the century. The politician has been unleashing her unique brand of disruptions, which includes publicly sharing graphic images of phalloplasty to further target gender-affirming care for trans patients. And Greene being the problematic individual she continues to be, has chosen to double down on the regressive claim that there are only two genders. 

Recommended Videos

Using the eve of International Women’s Day as her launching ground, MTG has taken to Twitter to claim that “there are TWO Genders: Male and Female.” 

“It’s time to get biological men the hell out of women’s locker rooms and sports! We must end the radical gender ideology of the left.”

Apparently, the years of strenuous education she went through to attain her position of power have been lost on her. Because you can study all you want, it will only earn you the title of being literate. To be truly educated means bypassing the narrow lanes of restrictive ideologies and actually accepting the world as well as one with broader and forever expanding boundaries. Safe to say, Greene has not only skipped this but put a limitless ocean of skewed opinions between herself and reality to keep away from it. 

Thankfully, while the politician is far from understanding how woefully misinformed and bigoted she sounds, those in the comments of her tweet have not shied away from highlighting how there is “one psychopath” in Congress and how if the world needs any banning, it should start with MTG’s strict exclusion beliefs. 

https://twitter.com/davidmweissman/status/1633584425807093760?s=20

Some have armed themselves with sarcasm to point out how Greene is sorely missing out on the things that actually need all the dramatic hoopla she is instead investing in.

This is just another notch in her severely controversial belt, which, as stated above, includes her ongoing drive to get her “Protect Children’s Innocence Act” bill passed that would prohibit gender-affirming care for any patient. Is it possible to make her see reason? Given that she is dead set on proving that her mindset perfectly matches the depthless trenches of her fashion choices, we would say no.